Talk:Riot Games

Relevancy

This seems irrelevant, given that the article only really mentions worker rights concerns, which are outside the scope of this wiki. Matt78 (talk) 22:34, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

 Done. I filled out the article and removed the irrelevant passage. — Sojourna (talk) 00:07, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. Matt78 (talk) 00:09, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

@Mr Pollo, does there need to be incident for a company article to exist? It is quite bare-bones, but there's a very relevant entry in the CIS section. — Sojourna (talk) 23:25, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

It is best practice to have an incident when making a company article, as we don't know if the article will be written in a pro or anti-consumer light. In this case, it does mention the inclusion of forced arbitration, so the notice can be removed. Hopefully the article does get expanded on in the coming months (I don't know anything about Riot Games' practices), but we don't want the wiki to have multiple company articles without any incidents. Mr Pollo (talk) 20:39, 26 September 2026 (UTC)